The first order of business will be to determine whether to retrofit the Wyodak coal-fired power plant near Gillette or the Dave Johnston coal plant outside Glenrock. Rocky Mountain Power has not offered a timeline for that decision. Once a site has been selected, according to the company, the partners will “conduct feasibility evaluations, with an expectation of advancing to various phases of engineering and design studies,” according to the company.

After those studies are complete, Rocky Mountain Power and its partners will make a final determination about whether to move forward with construction.

Critically, Rocky Mountain Power ratepayers will be spared from having to cover “upfront” costs for the engineering design and feasibility analysis — costs that could exceed $10 million, according to some estimates.

“Any upfront development capital costs of the project will not be shouldered by Rocky Mountain Power customers but will instead be carried by the 8 Rivers development team,” the utility said.

Gov. Mark Gordon gave credit to himself and lawmakers for what he considers a remarkable step forward in implementing one of his top climate and energy policies.

“This decision to take this action comes as a result of the Wyoming Legislature and me working closely together in both policy and legislation in support of keeping our coal as a base fuel for dependable, dispatchable energy,” Gordon said in a prepared statement on Friday.

State mandateThe plan is a major step forward for Wyoming’s controversial efforts to force utilities to retrofit the state’s coal-fueled power plants with carbon capture technology in hopes of extending the operating life of the plants — and the jobs and revenue they provide to local communities.

The Wyoming Legislature has passed a handful of bills in recent years to mandate carbon capture retrofits at coal plants and to sell the captured greenhouse gas for industrial uses such as enhanced oil recovery.

Lawmakers passed Senate File 42 — Low-carbon reliable energy standards-amendments in March, which not only moved the compliance deadline back from 2030 to 2033, but clarified that Wyoming ratepayers are on the hook for both the cost of analyzing the feasibility of retrofitting coal plants and the cost of construction and operation. Those costs are not insignificant, particularly at a time when electricity customers are already seeing rate hikes.

Cost estimatesBlack Hills Energy currently taps its Wyoming customers for a $1.1 million “low carbon” surcharge to cover the costs of state-mandated feasibility studies, while Rocky Mountain Power customers pay an annual $2 million. And that’s the ratepayer burden for just the initial phases of study. The next phases of mandated studies for Black Hill Energy, for example, could exceed $10 million, according to the company’s initial filings with the state.

However, those particular liabilities, at least for Rocky Mountain Power customers, would shift to 8 Rivers as the partnership moves forward, according to the utility.

When is unclear.Then there’s the cost of actually building and operating a carbon capture facility at an existing coal-fired power plant — a prospect that many critics have said is too costly and technologically challenging compared to non-fossil fuel alternatives. Construction costs alone range from $500 million to beyond $1 billion for each of the four coal-burning units now subject to Wyoming’s mandate, according to preliminary estimates utilities filed with the state in 2023.

Both Rocky Mountain Power and Black Hills Energy are expected to file updated engineering and implementation cost estimates with the state next week. Regardless of the estimated price tag, the utilities’ ratepayers will still be on the hook to cover whatever might ultimately be built.

“A great deal of work remains ahead before we can talk with any certainty about whether this project will be built,” Rocky Mountain Power spokesman David Eskelsen told WyoFile on Friday. “This is an exciting proposal, to be sure, but it must satisfy the regulatory standard of being in the public interest before proceeding to the construction phase. That’s the question the MOU is crafted to address.”

The utility, however, described the application of 8 Rivers’ carbon capture technology at its Wyoming coal plants as economic and “competitively viable.”

“Rocky Mountain Power has been diligently engaged in the process to comply with Wyoming’s desire to implement carbon capture at the company’s coal generating units in Wyoming,” Rocky Mountain Power Vice President for Environmental, Fuels and Mining James Owen said in a prepared statement. “The partnership and collaboration announced today is a major step forward in determining if carbon capture technologies can bring benefits to our customers in Wyoming at a reasonable cost.”

WyoFile is an independent nonprofit news organization focused on Wyoming people, places and policy.

This story was posted on March 29, 2024.